Dear all, Some minor comments from my side: Section 3.2 : it could be useful to state the general requirement after the TDM example Section 4.1 : editorial : The solution document is not a source of reqs. Some nits : The references also need some editing, the html version from tools.ietf.org seems not to process them correctly.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cyril Margaria > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > ext Julien Meuric > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06 > > Hi all and best wishes for 2013. > > This e-mail starts a WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-06. > Please send your comments to the PCE. You may review the document in > front of the corresponding extension I-D, which should be last called > soon. > > This WG LC will end on Wednesday January 30, noon UTC. > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > > P.S.: An IPR was disclosed on this I-D in August 2012 > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&docume > nt_search=draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req). > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
