Hi- I agree. Indeed a much needed draft.
Thanks Regards Š Zafar -----Original Message----- From: Ina Minei <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 12:08 PM To: "Jan Medved (jmedved)" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review & adoption as a WG document >This is useful and straightforward functionality that is much needed for >a deployment and completes the solution. > >I support this draft's adoption as a WG document (but I guess we will >wait for the chairs to send the official poll, right?) > >Ina > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan >Medved (jmedved) >Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:49 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for >review & adoption as a WG document > >Dear PCE'rs, > >can you please review draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful and send your >comments to the list? The draft is at: >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful/. > >Also, can you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting >draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful as a PCE WG document? > > > >Thanks a lot in advance, >Siva and Jan >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
