Hi, All,
Agree; This is part of the basic extensions needed for implementing
stateful PCE and should be considered for adoption by WG.
Regards,
Xian (speaking as co-author)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ina Minei
Sent: 2013年4月4日 0:09
To: Jan Medved (jmedved); [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review
& adoption as a WG document
This is useful and straightforward functionality that is much needed for a
deployment and completes the solution.
I support this draft's adoption as a WG document (but I guess we will wait for
the chairs to send the official poll, right?)
Ina
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan
Medved (jmedved)
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review &
adoption as a WG document
Dear PCE'rs,
can you please review draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful and send your comments
to the list? The draft is at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful/.
Also, can you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting
draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful as a PCE WG document?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Siva and Jan
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
