Hi, 

   Thank you for questions. 

  I do not understand your statement "if the PCC state is so big that could not 
be transferred in one shot (not necessarily one packet or one datagram). " When 
we are talking here is to synchronize the LSP-DB, which consists of LSPs of 
manageable message size. Actually, it is possible to combine multiple LSP 
states together. 

 Secondly, for what you mentioned "first request fails", what do you mean by 
that? Since PCEP is based on TCP, so there should be mechanisms to support 
reliable delivery (outside of PCEP). So, NO MATTER if it is full sync. or 
partial sync., the DB will be incomplete anyway even if your assumption holds. 
So it does not invalidate our proposal. 

 As for the last comment, if you read (or may be interested to) the WG draft 
carefully, the function you mentioned below as "A PCC SHOULD remember the 
deleted LSP as well" is already supported there. So, I do not see how it is an 
issue at all. 

Regards,
Xian

________________________________________
发件人: [email protected] [[email protected]] 代表 Giovanni Martinelli 
(giomarti) [[email protected]]
发送时间: 2013年8月1日 1:50
到: [email protected]
主题: [Pce] comment on draft-zhx-pce-stateful-lsp-sync-00

Dear Authors,

here an engineer (not necessarily a network engineer) comment. It comes to my 
mind during today presentation so ...  tossing to the list hope help discussion.

Looks to me you are adding an optimisation that actually may add more problems 
than the one you are trying to solve.

I first wonder if the PCC state is so big that could not be transferred in one 
shot (not necessarily one packet or one datagram).  In case first request fails 
wound't be better just retry instead of adding the complexity of incremental 
updates?

Second, you have to pay the price of partially synchronised DB. What you can do 
with a partial state? My first feeling you have to just consider your  DB as 
not synchronised.

Third, You also imply there's more state to maintain at the PCC side as well... 
 e.g. "A PCC SHOULD remember the deleted LSP as well" .

Cheers
G




_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to