Support.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Julien Meuric <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. > > Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for > stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the > aforementionned I-D. > Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support > draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG > document? > > As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in > case of opposition). > > Thanks, > > JP & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
