Hi.
The support looks clear. Authors, you may publish the document as
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-00.
Thanks,
JP & Julien
Nov. 12, 2013 - Julien Meuric:
Hi all.
Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents
for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the
aforementionned I-D.
Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you
support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for
a PCE WG document?
As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory
in case of opposition).
Thanks,
JP & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
