The following errata report has been verified for RFC6006,
"Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for 
Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6006&eid=3830

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Udayasree <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2013-12-10
Verified by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 3.15

Original Text
-------------
To indicate P2MP message fragmentation errors associated with a P2MP
path request, a new Error-Type (17) and subsequent error-values are
defined as follows for inclusion in the PCEP-ERROR object:

Corrected Text
--------------
To indicate P2MP message fragmentation errors associated with a P2MP
path request, a new Error-Type (18) and subsequent error-values are
defined as follows for inclusion in the PCEP-ERROR object:

Notes
-----
17 P2MP END-POINTS Error
18 P2MP Fragmentation Error

It should be 18 in this statement

--------------------------------------
RFC6006 (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication 
Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths
Publication Date    : September 2010
Author(s)           : Q. Zhao, Ed., D. King, Ed., F. Verhaeghe, T. Takeda, Z. 
Ali, J. Meuric
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to