El 16/07/2014 0:48, Leeyoung escribió:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: Zhangxian (Xian); Leeyoung; [email protected]
> Cc: Greg Bernstein; Zhenghaomian
> Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for 
> draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data-00.txt
>
>
> In the intro you say that participating in IGP is cumbersome for a number of 
> reasons (significant traffic load, need for multiple IGP implementations), 
> but I think one of the main reasons which IMHO should be added is "time". 
> IGPs can take time to converge and the PCE is often asked to quickly provide 
> new paths upon failures. A simple, dedicated, update from the nodes detecting 
> the failure to the PCE would be much more efficient also in dealing with this 
> issue.
>
>


> Personally, I think this architectures would be extremely helpful in an SDN 
> hierarchical environment (maybe I'm going a bit off topic...) where topology 
> updates need to be sent from a child SDN controller to a parent SDN 
> controller and where running an IGP between controllers would be extremely 
> complex if not impossible.

Ramon> I also find this option quite interesting, for the reasons stated
above, IGP convergence, simplicity, etc.; some implementors have played
with this in the past, e.g. for example
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-02.txt and
several research papers, with Notification extensions, which can,
simply, wrap LSAs as a straightforward option. I am just worried that,
when this was discussed, we got some off-line feedback that it did not
seem to be appropriate to extend PCEP for such purposes, and that PCEP
it was a request/response protocol for path computations, not for TE
dissemination.

Much like the discussions we had with stateful extensions, it would be
great to know whether the WG thinks it is a good idea or not :)
Thanks
R.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to