Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In this text: The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by a legacy implementation. If one of the subobjects is received in a PCEP object that does not understand it, it will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. I think something is confused. Do PCEP objects understand subobjects? Or is this The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by legacy implementations. If a legacy implementation receives one of the subobjects that it does not understand in a PCEP object, the legacy implementation will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. correct? _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
