Hi Spencer, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
> Sent: 17 November 2015 08:11
> To: The IESG
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; pce-
> [email protected]
> Subject: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-
> sequence-09: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In this text:
> 
>    The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood
>    by a legacy implementation.  If one of the subobjects is received in
>    a PCEP object that does not understand it, it will behave as
>    described in Section 3.4.3.
> 
> I think something is confused. Do PCEP objects understand subobjects? Or is
> this
> 
>    The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood
>    by legacy implementations.  If a legacy implementation receives one
>    of the subobjects that it does not understand in a PCEP object, the
>    legacy implementation will behave as described in Section 3.4.3.
> 
> correct?

Your wording is much better; the change is made in the working copy. 

Thanks! 

Regards,
Dhruv

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to