Thanks for the update, Qin.
 
As I said to you in private conversation, I think this is good work, in scope
for the WG, and useful.
The high revision number of the document reflects, I believe, that you saw the
future and started the work quite a bit earlier than anyone was ready for. I
think we are ready now.
 
The one (small) thing I mentioned that I would like to see added to the draft is
a small section that relates this work to draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane.
It seems to me that everything is compatible and all we need to do is describe
briefly how the pieces it together.
 
If you like, I can suggest text.
 
Thanks,
Adrian
 
 
From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: 28 March 2017 00:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pce] Update of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11
 
Hi, All:
Didn't get time to introduce PCEP extension for SFC support:
Here is the update of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11> , 
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-pce-42-pcep-extensions-for-
sfc-00.pdf
This draft provides PCEP extension to address Path computation and
classification requirements defined in RFC7665 and 
I-D.ietf-sfc-control-plane. It is also aligned with SFC control plane and teas
WG pce central control drafts.
 
This draft has been around several IETF meetings and became stable when several
dependent documents have been solid as basis.
Before this meeting, we recieved a few comments from SFC chairs and it has been
addressed in v-(11).
We are happy to recieve additional comments if you have. Thanks!
 
-Qin
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to