Dear All, yes/support with comments: - since the draft does not discuss actual control of the protection switchover but introduces objects related to Path Protection Association Group I encourage authors to consider reflecting that in the title of the document; - Path Protection Association Group, as I understand, defined as 1:N, i.e. one working and N protection paths, while M:N is more general case or protection. I encourage authors to consider ways to support M:N PPAG; - above I've made assumption that the protection mode supported by PPAG is 1:N (1:1 is just special case). But PPAG may be used to signal association for 1+1 protection scheme. If that is the case, can 1+1 be expressed using proposed S and P flags or additional flag is required?
Regards, Greg > > > *From:* Pce [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Hardwick > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2018 13:10 > *To:* [email protected]; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protection-05 > > > > Dear PCE WG > > > > This is the start of a two week poll on making > draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 > a PCE working group document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protection/ > > > > Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating > “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your > reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to > see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > > > The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Jon and Julien > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
