Hi Dhruv, Many thanks for your review and suggestions.
Please see inline with <RG>… From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 5:06 AM To: Jonathan Hardwick <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 Support! A few comments that can be handled in the later versions (1) An error handling when this condition is not met – o An LSP can not be part of more than one Bidirectional LSP Association Group. <RG> Added in Section 5.5. (2) Update the section 2.1 with new template based on RFC8174 <RG> Updated Section 2.1. (3) In section 3.1, add clarity on who reports the reverse LSP LSP2, the remote endpoint D or the originating node A? Need to consider deletion and status down as well. <RG> Updated Section 3.1 and added Figure 2A and 2B. (4) Clarification on if more than one forward and reverse LSP can be part of the association group <RG> Updated in Section 4.1. More than one forward LSP and/ or reverse LSP can be part of a Bidirectional LSP Association Group. (5) A word on association source maybe simply a reference to [I-D.ietf-pce-association] will do! <RG> Updated Section 4.1. Revised document can be found at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01 Welcome your further review comments and suggestions. Thanks, Rakesh Thanks! Dhruv From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 10 April 2018 19:35 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24. Many thanks, Jon and Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
