Hi Mike,
Thank you for your review of the document.
Please see inline with <RG>…
From: "=SMTP:mtaillon@cisco. com" <mtail...@cisco.com>
Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org"
<draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org>, "pce-cha...@ietf.org"
<pce-cha...@ietf.org>
Cc: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>, Ravi Singh
<ra...@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org>
Resent-To: "=SMTP:rgandhi@cisco. com" <rgan...@cisco.com>,
<bin_...@cable.comcast.com>
Resent-Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM
Hi
Support.
Comments. (Sorry if already raised — am new to the mailer)
4.2 — please clarify that TLV is indeed optional
o If the Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV is missing, it
means the LSP is the forward LSP.
— does this imply optional in forward direction only ?
<RG> Updated Section 4.2 with additional details.
— How is this association used during reporting/delegation ? For single sided,
is a single PCRpt used for both directions ?
<RG> Updated Section 3.1 with details and added Figures 2A and 2B.
--------------
Perhaps out of scope of this document:
— For single sided, its not clear how the REVERSE_LSP object is determined.
Is this returned via PCEP from the PCE ?
<RG> Updated Section 3.1 with details.
Revised document can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-01
Welcome any additional review comments and suggestions you may have.
Thanks,
Rakesh
-mike
On Apr 13, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Ravi Singh
<ra...@juniper.net<mailto:ra...@juniper.net>> wrote:
Hi
Yes/support.
Ravi
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>;
draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
Dear PCE WG
This is the start of a two week poll on making
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbarth-2Dpce-2Dassociation-2Dbidir_&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=6ArkE4n20mNZQF6JxrMYwJyAGBWWjzhSIC2O3-fXPV4&m=zZvcysHnjvmDB_Wpm9RJVZtjLzUOK_I9es23IsFAuHE&s=R6dZ1JkRnNd2Nrd9OJIjRhLk4Ngkw5jReHfNX8tKFNQ&e=>
Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support”
or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes,
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the
document is a WG document.
The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24.
Many thanks,
Jon and Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
