Hi Jon, The following is the text agreed upon between Igor and Dhruv and myself. --- we will update the draft with this added text in the revision.
NEW: VN association can be generally applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets where a VN member within a VN corresponds to a TE tunnel Thanks. Young -----Original Message----- From: Leeyoung Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:07 AM To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <[email protected]>; Igor Bryskin <[email protected]> Subject: RE: VN Association @ PCE Hi Dhruv, Igor agreed with the proposal. Young -----Original Message----- From: Leeyoung Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 11:06 PM To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <[email protected]>; Igor Bryskin <[email protected]> Subject: RE: VN Association @ PCE Igor, On your comment on PCE VN association: > Igor: This is a good idea but could it be done in a generic way rather at a > "VN association" specifically. Just like a group of LSPs in a mesh. Our resolution is to add text: "VN association can be generally applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets where a VN member within a VN corresponds to a TE tunnel." What do you think? Thanks. Young -----Original Message----- From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 10:35 PM To: Leeyoung <[email protected]> Subject: Re: VN Association @ PCE Lets talk this over! We need to get Igor on board as well. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM Leeyoung <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Dhruv, > > I think we can say that VN association includes tunnel sets. When defining > VN, we can say we can bundle TE tunnels. > > What do you think? We may add text: "VN association can be generally > applicable to bundle TE tunnel sets." > > Young > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 8:58 PM > To: Leeyoung <[email protected]> > Subject: VN Association @ PCE > > Hi Young, > > We will be asked if we have resolved the Igor comments on the mic from IETF > 102. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-102-pce/ > > 4. Previously Discussed Topics > 4.1. ACTN VN Association (Daniele Ceccarelli, 10 min) [90/90] > draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association-05 > > Igor: This is a good idea but could it be done in a generic way rather at a > "VN association" specifically. Just like a group of LSPs in a mesh. > Daniele Ceccarelli: Association is anyway generic, This is a new association > type, you could define another! > Igor: Think of a TE tunnel set. > Daniele: You can define another association. > Young: What Igor is asking is can it cover more than VN, with a generic TE > tunnel set included. > > Thanks! > Dhruv _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
