Hi, In Prague we had a discussion of draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors.
My recollection is that we decided that there was no great hurry to push this document to completion, but that we didn't want to abandon it. Checking back with the minutes, there was an objective that we encourage authors of other documents to adhere to the error behaviours described in this document. We do this possibly by putting text on a wiki page, but first by discussing the guidelines on the mailing list. Looks like we were particularly interested in the behaviours when there are multiple PCEs present. We also discussed the possibilities for encouraging an "Error Handling" section in all our drafts, or at least for a section on "Error Handling in Multi-PCE Scenarios" when applicable. Would the authors of draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors like to take the lead on this? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
