Hi, Adrian, WGs, Thank you for bringing the issue to the list, I think we agreed the direction you mentioned 'no haste but keep moving' in Prague. We would definitely like to provide some text as guideline for other documents, either in the draft or on the wiki page, or both. Personally I need to understand the context in the wiki page before doing that. Do the chairs want to see a separate paragraph talking about the error handling? Or we put the text together with other sections like 'implement policy'?
We can move on providing text once we can agree on how to manage, thank you. Best wishes, Haomian (as one of the co-authors) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Adrian Farrel 发送时间: 2019年5月31日 23:25 收件人: [email protected] 主题: [Pce] PCEP Enhanced Errors Hi, In Prague we had a discussion of draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors. My recollection is that we decided that there was no great hurry to push this document to completion, but that we didn't want to abandon it. Checking back with the minutes, there was an objective that we encourage authors of other documents to adhere to the error behaviours described in this document. We do this possibly by putting text on a wiki page, but first by discussing the guidelines on the mailing list. Looks like we were particularly interested in the behaviours when there are multiple PCEs present. We also discussed the possibilities for encouraging an "Error Handling" section in all our drafts, or at least for a section on "Error Handling in Multi-PCE Scenarios" when applicable. Would the authors of draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors like to take the lead on this? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
