Yes/Support. I have reviewed the drafts and think this work useful. Given the widely application of VN, the resource allocation would be a technical challenge problem, and PCEP can absolutely play a key role in this procedure. This draft provides the solution for the VNs requested to be associated into various groups, based on the computation result.
Thank you. Best wishes, Haomian -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Adrian Farrel 发送时间: 2019年7月14日 21:00 收件人: [email protected] 抄送: [email protected] 主题: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association Hi WG, He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for adoption and... - the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing - I did an early review and the authors span a new version So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll ending on 4th August. Please send your comments of support or antipathy. In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even possibly implement the draft. Many thanks, Adrian (for the chairs) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
