Hi PCE WG, The adoption poll for this draft was not overwhelming. Possibly this was because of the overlap with IETF-105 when you were all busy.
Thanks to everyone who did respond to the poll. If there are any more of you out there who think the WG should adopt this work please speak up. Especially happy to hear form those who have read the draft, and those who plan to help with reviews and implementations. Thanks, Adrian (still trying to step down!) -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 14 July 2019 14:00 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association Hi WG, He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for adoption and... - the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing - I did an early review and the authors span a new version So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll ending on 4th August. Please send your comments of support or antipathy. In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even possibly implement the draft. Many thanks, Adrian (for the chairs) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
