Dear WG, I have read this document and believe it is helpful to have a quick publication.
This is a small draft with very focused problem statement on PCEP flag processing and also clear target documents to be updated. With the growing number of flags in PCEP it would be helpful to guide the implementation on a standard way to process unknown flags. My 2 cents, Haomian -------------------------------------------------- 郑好棉 Zheng Haomian Mobile: +86-13066975206<tel:+86-13066975206> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 发件人：Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> 收件人：pce <[email protected]> 抄 送：pce-chairs <[email protected]> 时 间：2019-08-31 02:14:56 主题[Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 Hi WG, This email starts a 'working group last call' for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. See [2] for context. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your concern. If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019. Thanks, PCE Chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tTkJKO34xTD0CY48IJCk5FjmiJ4 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
