Hi all, I have read draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 and think it is ready for publication. As it was mentioned, it is small but important since it closes possible interoperability issues of handling PCEP flags in SRP object between different implementations.
SY, Boris -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 9:14 PM To: [email protected] Cc: pce-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 Hi WG, This email starts a 'working group last call' for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. See [2] for context. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your concern. If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019. Thanks, PCE Chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tTkJKO34xTD0CY48IJCk5FjmiJ4 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
