Hi Huanan, Thank you for your support. Do you mean how bidirectional SR would work with path protection as in: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11
If yes, both are complementary. We can add text to indicate so. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:53 PM [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi WG, > > Support the adption. > I have read the draft, it is ready to be a WG document. > The extensions to PCEP were clear and the procedures to setup > bidirectional SR-LSP were given too. > One comment: If we need SR-LSP redundancy, how should we do at the > bidirectional > SR-LSP scenario? > > Best Regards, > Huanan > > *From:* [email protected] > *Date:* 2020-01-17 18:12 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06? > Hi all, > > It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06. > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please > use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or > disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
