Hi all, This I-D has enough support to be adopted.
Before we proceed, we'd like to see an update addressing at least the issue about the number of names on the front page. Authors, please submit a -07 version accordingly, so that we can move the draft forward. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien On 17/01/2020 11:12, [email protected] wrote: > Hi all, > > It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06. > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please > use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or > disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
