Hi Tom, WG,

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:36 PM tom petch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Pce <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: 01 February 2021 10:54
>
> Hi WG,
>
> We have received a request from the authors of
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp for an early code point allocation.
>
> <tp>
>
> Which code point or code points?
>
> This I-D asks IANA to allocate eleven values; to which of these does the 
> early allocation request apply?
>

All of them.

This I-D is asking for allocations from 3 existing sub-registries:

ASSOCIATION Type Field
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-02#section-7.1)
https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#association-type-field

PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-02#section-7.2)
https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object

PCEP TLV Type Indicators
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-02#section-7.3)
https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-tlv-type-indicators

Please feedback to the list if you feel the RFC 7120 criteria listed
in the original email does not meet any (or all) of the codepoints
allocation requests.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

> Tom Petch
>
> RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>
> b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
> handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
> (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
> in an Internet-Draft.
> c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
> there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
> specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>
> If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
> believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
> reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If
> the chairs hear no objections by Monday, February 15th, we will kick off
> the early allocation request.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to