Hi Tom, Thank you for your valuable feedback.
Some of the issues you point out are easy to address and we've already requested the authors to revise the I-D accordingly. To fully resolve your concern, could you please point any other specific parts where you feel you have to "interpret the words the way you think they should have been"? If you even have some text to suggest, that could smoothly ease the update. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien On 17/02/2021 12:46, tom petch wrote: > <snip> > <tp> > I am sure that IANA will cope because they always do, but it will be by > reading between the lines, applying intelligence to what the authors may have > meant, and so on. Editorially this is a poor I-D (as yet), and that quality > verges on the technical aspects. > > Thus 7.3 says the I-D defines five new TLV and lists four; this also occurs > in the body of the I-D. A reader might also notice the absence of TBD2 and > wonder. > > Or the new Association. Thus needs an identifier. Trouble is, the I-D uses > (at least) three different ones; this looseness of terminology can lead to > problems down the line. (MPLS I see as a classic in how not to specify IANA > registries and I see this heading the same way). > > Likewise the identifiers used in s.7 do not match those in current use, a > good way of storing up future trouble. > > Is the specification adequate? Only if you do not take it literally and > interpret the words the way you think they should have been. > > Tom Petch > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
