Hi John, This errata should be accepted. Please handle it at your convenience.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:08 PM RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5088, > "OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6459 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: tom petch <[email protected]> > > Section: 7.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in > the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.1.5. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in > the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.5. > > > Notes > ----- > There is no Section 4.1.5. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5088 (draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation > Element (PCE) Discovery > Publication Date : January 2008 > Author(s) : JL. Le Roux, Ed., JP. Vasseur, Ed., Y. Ikejiri, R. > Zhang > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Path Computation Element > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
