Done, thanks. —John
On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:10 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi John, This errata should be accepted. Please handle it at your convenience. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:08 PM RFC Errata System <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5088, "OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6459<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6459__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!WanVCBm4IRnAKAoC6dJjz3dyr2_XK7ixQuibW45Mhg-6NkcQUWjbgao5wtb2Fw$> -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: tom petch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Section: 7.2 Original Text ------------- This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.1.5. Corrected Text -------------- This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.5. Notes ----- There is no Section 4.1.5. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5088 (draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-08) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery Publication Date : January 2008 Author(s) : JL. Le Roux, Ed., JP. Vasseur, Ed., Y. Ikejiri, R. Zhang Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
