I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks, Siva On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 5:26 PM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chair/WG > > > > I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft and it has been disclosed. > > > > With regards to late declaration, apparently I am not aware of the > channels that IPRs can be declared against a draft. > > > > Thanks > > Hooman > > > > > > > > *From:* Pce <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia > - CA/Ottawa) > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 2, 2021 8:02 AM > *To:* Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>; Daniel Voyer <[email protected]>; > Rajarathinam, Saranya (Nokia - US/Mountain View) < > [email protected]>; Ehsan Hemmati (ehemmati) < > [email protected]>; Tarek Saad <[email protected]>; Siva Sivabalan < > [email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03 > > > > Hi Dhruv > > > > Please give me couple of days to sort this out. > > > > This was a surprise to me to be honest. > > > > I am talking to appropriate internal people > > > > Thanks > > Hooman > > > > *From:* Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 2, 2021 5:56 AM > *To:* Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <[email protected]>; > Daniel Voyer <[email protected]>; Rajarathinam, Saranya (Nokia - > US/Mountain View) <[email protected]>; Ehsan Hemmati > (ehemmati) <[email protected]>; Tarek Saad <[email protected]>; Siva > Sivabalan <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: IPR Poll for draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03 > > > > Hi Authors, > > > > In light of the recent IPR disclosure [ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5225/], we would like to give authors a > chance to amend their poll responses. Could each of you post your response > again as a reply to this email? > > · I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be > disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. > > · I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been > disclosed to the IETF. > > · I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been > disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a > timely manner. > > Reminder to all: Please disclose any IPR as early as possible. See BCP 79 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179.html > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv, Julien & Hari > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:09 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we would like all authors to > confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. > > Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: > > - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be > disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. > - I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already > been disclosed to the IETF. > - I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet > been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed > in a timely manner. > > Thanks, > Dhruv, Julien & Hari > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
