Hello All, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Best, Ehsan On Nov 2, 2021, at 2:55 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Authors, In light of the recent IPR disclosure [https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5225/], we would like to give authors a chance to amend their poll responses. Could each of you post your response again as a reply to this email? * I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. * I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. * I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Reminder to all: Please disclose any IPR as early as possible. See BCP 79 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179.html Thanks! Dhruv, Julien & Hari On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:09 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we would like all authors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: * I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. * I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. * I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, Dhruv, Julien & Hari
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
