Hi Julien,
I've read this document and I think it's a useful solution. I support its adoption. Best regards, Shunwan -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 12:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec Hi all, This message is the following step to the situation previously summarized by Dhruv [1]. As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is a right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item? Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel useful, especially in case of negative answer. Thanks, Julien (As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative process.) -- [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
