Hi PCE'rs,Thank you for the feedback. This extension is readopted as a WG item in a dedicated document.
Authors, please post a draft-ietf-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec-00. Cheers, Julien On 06/01/2022 13:57, [email protected] wrote:
Hi all and best wishes for 2022.Gentle reminder: we started a poll some days before Christmas. If it was pure new work, I'd assume there isn't enough interest yet. Since it's pre-existing work that has been split to catch up with another WG's work in progress, I'd feel more comfortable to get some explicit feedback.Thanks, Julien On 16/12/2021 17:49, [email protected] wrote:Hi all,This message is the following step to the situation previously summarized by Dhruv [1].As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is a right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item?Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel useful, especially in case of negative answer.Thanks, Julien (As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative process.) --[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
