Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [S4.1; question] * For clarity, when the locator prefix is a /48 and the nodes are each allocated a /64, which of these is expected: [a] {LB=48, LN=64, FUN=..., ARG=...}, or [b] {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...} (where LB + LN = 64)? _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
