Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:54 AM Chengli (Cheng Li) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Many thanks for your comments and question, the answer would be [b]
> {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...}
>
>
> For clarity, we have added the following text in the draft-
>
> [RFC8986] defines an SRv6 SID as consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG, where a
> locator (LOC) is encoded in the L most significant bits of the SID,
> followed by F bits of function (FUNCT) and A bits of arguments (ARG). A
> locator may be represented as B:N where B is the SRv6 SID locator block
> (IPv6 prefix allocated for SRv6 SIDs by the operator) and N is the
> identifier of the parent node instantiating the SID called locator node.
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng
>
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13
>
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Erik Kline via Datatracker [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2022年2月3日 9:18
> 收件人: The IESG <[email protected]>
> 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> 主题: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [S4.1; question]
>
> * For clarity, when the locator prefix is a /48 and the nodes are each
> allocated a /64, which of these is expected:
>
> [a] {LB=48, LN=64, FUN=..., ARG=...}, or
>
> [b] {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...}
>
> (where LB + LN = 64)?
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
