Hi, WG, We updated the draft according to the comments from shepherd review (in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/lxZjj0jUvRHcorh1admITW67sT8/ ), and we think it's ready to be proceeded to the next step, thanks.
Best wishes, Haomian (on behalf of authors & contributors) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2022年6月16日 11:12 收件人: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaom...@huawei.com>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>; Oscar de Dios <oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>; Victor Lopez <victor.lo...@nokia.com>; Young Lee <younglee...@gmail.com>; Zafar Ali <z...@cisco.com> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls Revision: 18 Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-controlled Networks Document date: 2022-06-16 Group: pce Pages: 25 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18 Abstract: The PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) has been extended to support stateful PCE functions where the Stateful PCE maintains information about paths and resource usage within a network, but these extensions do not cover all requirements for GMPLS networks. This document provides extensions required for PCEP so as to enable the usage of a stateful PCE capability in GMPLS-controlled networks. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
