Hi Haomian, Thanks for the update and for taking my comments into consideration.
Just a few more issues - (1) Please fix the format of the table in Section 9.5 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls#section-9.5 If you look at our IANA registry - https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object ; the meaning is associated with Error-Type (which is already defined) and the Error-value includes the value and meaning. A reference on how to format the table - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9168#section-10.4 (2) Line spacing issue in RBNF in appendix There is a mix of double line space and single space. Please make it a single space everywhere. The tab formatting is also not aligned inside the RBNF. (3) List formatting in Section 6.1 is broken for END-POINTS (4) Copyright Notice says Simplified BSD, it should be Revised BSD. See https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/tlp-5/ (5) A general formatting pass of the I-D Please update the document one more time and I will start working on the Shepherd report after that. Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:04 AM Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, WG, > > We updated the draft according to the comments from shepherd review (in > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/lxZjj0jUvRHcorh1admITW67sT8/ ), > and we think it's ready to be proceeded to the next step, thanks. > > Best wishes, > Haomian (on behalf of authors & contributors) > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2022年6月16日 11:12 > 收件人: Zhenghaomian <[email protected]>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios < > [email protected]>; Oscar de Dios < > [email protected]>; Victor Lopez <[email protected]>; > Young Lee <[email protected]>; Zafar Ali <[email protected]> > 主题: New Version Notification for > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt > has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls > Revision: 18 > Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) > Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-controlled Networks > Document date: 2022-06-16 > Group: pce > Pages: 25 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls/ > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18 > > Abstract: > The PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) has been extended to support > stateful PCE functions where the Stateful PCE maintains information > about paths and resource usage within a network, but these > extensions do not cover all requirements for GMPLS networks. > > This document provides extensions required for PCEP so as to enable > the usage of a stateful PCE capability in GMPLS-controlled networks. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
