Hi Julien,
Thanks for following up on that. Noted, and will do on next revision when it
comes up.
Thanks!
Andrew
On 2022-08-11, 5:46 AM, "julien.meu...@orange.com" <julien.meu...@orange.com>
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
After talking with Robert Sparks about Idnits analysis, the best way to
address the error below while pleasing the IESG was to say in the
abstract "This document updates RFC 5440", without square brackets to
avoid creating a reference.
No need to trigger an update at this stage, but it would be nice to
include that change in the next revision down the road.
Thanks,
Julien
On 04/08/2022 12:05, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
> _From idnits:_
>
> - The abstract should avoid using references, i.e. you may replace
> "[RFC5440]" by a phrase like "the base specification".
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
