From: Pce <[email protected]> on behalf of Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Sent: 26 September 2022 08:51
Hi WG, The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to those who provided feedback and comments. Note that the SPRING WG documents referenced by this I-D have been updated and posted. <tp> Well, refreshed and a reference to an I-D is now a reference to an RFC (probably enforced by tools) but updated? A stretch - all the usual things that are wrong with YANG modules are still wrong so my concern that we may get stuck, waiting but I agree with adoption, we have to press on and hope:-( Tom Petch Authors, Please post a -00 version with no content change. Please handle comments received in -01. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 2:39 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 19th Sept 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
