Hi Haomian,
The emails are bouncing from huawei. Here is a snippet.
----
The mail system
<[email protected]> (expanded from
<[email protected]>): host
mx5.huawei.com[124.71.93.234] said: 554 5.7.1 Rejected due to SPF
validation, Illegal sender IP address. (in reply to DATA command)
----
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:07 AM Zhenghaomian <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Dhruv,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the message, the -11 is now uploaded.
>
>
>
> It’s strange that I did not receive these review and response… let me try
> to figure out the problem.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Haomian
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email protected]]
> *发送时间:* 2022年10月24日 14:49
> *收件人:* Zhenghaomian <[email protected]>
> *抄送:* Erik Kline <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; The IESG <
> [email protected]>; [email protected]; Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <
> [email protected]>; Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>
> *主题:* Re: [Pce] Erik Kline's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-09: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> Hi Haomian,
>
>
>
> Can you make the suggested change in the below email (that Erik agreed to)
> instead of "//" for the length. The reason -> the Length field's value is
> variable, but its size is 16 bits!
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dhruv
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 1:02 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your review, see inline...
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 11:23 AM Erik Kline via Datatracker <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-vn-association/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # Internet AD comments for {draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-09}
> CC @ekline
>
> ## Comments
>
> ### S4
>
> * The format layout diagram, Figure 2, states that Length is variable, as
> does the text that follows it, but the use of the "|" at the end of the
> first word implied to me that it was actually a 16-bit integer.
>
> Perhaps change the end of this line to just be "//" or something?
>
> Alternatively, if this field is actually a 16-bit integer then I suggest
> clarifying the text that says it's "variable".
>
>
>
> I suggest this change -
>
>
>
> OLD:
>
> Type: TBD2 (to be allocated by IANA)
>
> Length: Variable Length, which covers the value portion of the TLV.
>
> NEW:
> Type (16-bits): TBD2 (to be allocated by IANA)
>
> Length (16-bits): indicates the length of the value portion of the
>
> TLV in octets and MUST be greater than 0. The TLV MUST be zero-
>
> padded so that the TLV is 4-octet aligned.
>
> END
>
>
>
> * Related: what should an implementation do if the length of the VN is
> zero?
>
>
>
> We can add -
>
>
>
> If a PCEP speaker receives a VN ASSOCIATION object with a TLV that
> violates the rules specified in this document, then the PCEP
>
> speaker MUST send a PCErr message with Error-Type = 10
>
> (Reception of an invalid object) and Error-value
>
> = 11 (Malformed object) and MUST close the PCEP session.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dhruv
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
