Hi Huaimo,
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:41 PM Huaimo Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I read through the draft and think that it is ready to become a PCE > work item. Support its adoption. > > It seems that "RFC 7470" in Abstract should be removed or rephrased > since RFCs should not be referred directly in Abstract. > > The rule is that "the Abstract must not contain citations" [1]; i.e. " [RFC7470]" is wrong but "RFC 7470" is perfectly fine. Thanks! Dhruv [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7322.html#section-4.3 > Best Regards, > Huaimo > ------------------------------ > *From:* Pce <[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2023 3:46 AM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor > > Hi all, > > It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started to > document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to consider > its adoption by the WG. > Do you think draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16 [1] is ready to > become a PCE work item? Please express your support and/or concerns > using the mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > [1] > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor&data=05%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C9000544c6a0e4b7da47e08db71627f6c%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638228440087696094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zYv9OH5B3rQJkt9Uy62HoLo91GIvdHwoQzg%2FmdYIb9A%3D&reserved=0 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor> > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpce&data=05%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C9000544c6a0e4b7da47e08db71627f6c%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638228440087696094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=60GhgONkgk4PxmGZ7DVCSyWEk7FZzXkeOWN830xxDXo%3D&reserved=0 > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce> > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
