Hi Aijun, Two things,
(1) We dont want a charter that is open-ended with the proposed text "...and other possible forward data plane"; the correct thing to do would be to do a quick recharter when we have something new. (2) Instead of adding a Native-IP in that list, we suggest using the term CCDR and club this with PCECC with this change - OLD: - In cooperation with the TEAS Working Group, development of PCE- based architectures for Traffic Engineering including PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC). The PCEP extensions are developed in the PCE Working Group. NEW: - In cooperation with the TEAS Working Group, development of PCE- based architectures for Traffic Engineering including PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC) and Central Control Dynamic Routing (CCDR). The PCEP extensions are developed in the PCE Working Group. END I made this change in GitHub - https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/tree/main Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:47 AM Aijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Dhruv: > > > > I recommend the following changes to the current charter: > > > > 1) Further, the PCE WG also handle protocol extensions for new path > setup types of Segment Routing (SR), BIER, and Detnet. > > è Further, the PCE WG also handle protocol extensions for new path setup > types of Segment Routing (SR), Native IP, BIER, Detnet and other possible > forward data plane. > > 2）Add one items in the “Milestone” > > è July 2023 Submit PCEP extension for Native IP as a Proposed > Standard > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Aijun Wang > > China Telecom > > > > *发件人:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *代表 *Dhruv Dhody > *发送时间:* 2023年7月4日 13:15 > *收件人:* [email protected] > *主题:* Re: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update > > > > Hi WG, > > > > A gentle reminder for your comments on the proposed text for recharter! > > We can also use a few "I have read the proposed charter update text and I > support rechartering!" :) > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv > > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:07 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > > > The PCE WG charter (-07) was last updated in 2014. Your chairs and AD > discussed the need to bring the charter up to date. We have made a proposed > small update (-08) and placed it in our WG's Github - > https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter > > > > A diff of the changes can be seen at - > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-07.txt&difftype=--html&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-08.txt > > > > We request the WG to review the proposed charter update. We suggest using > the mailing list for discussion and proposing substantial changes. Minor > edits may also be suggested via PR directly on the GitHub. > > > > Please provide all your comments before 5th July. We would then forward > the request to our AD. > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv & Julien > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
