Hi Dhruv and WG, I support the adoption of this draft. I have reviewed the updated version and this draft can support the BIER-TE path establishment with PCEP extesnsions. The PCEP extensions is well-written including the BIER-TE related objects and procedures. Before adoption, I suggest to fix the abbreviation of BIER-TE and clarify the "TE" to Tree Engineering. And I also noticed that the Figure 2, 3 and 4 has no figure name. It may be better if this can be fixed in next version.
Best Regards, Quan <Hi WG, < This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/ <Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? < Please state your reasons - <Why / Why not? <What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? <Are you willing to work on this draft? <Review comments should be posted to the list. < Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023. < Please be more vocal during WG polls! <Thanks! Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
