Hi Quan，
Thanks for your valueable comments. According to your comments, we have updated
the draft.The link is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/.
Please review the updates. Thanks!
Best Regards.
Ran
Original
From: 熊泉
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected]
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2023年09月26日 15:20
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11
Hi Dhruv and WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
I have reviewed the updated version and this draft can support the BIER-TE path
establishment with PCEP extesnsions.
The PCEP extensions is well-written including the BIER-TE related objects and
procedures.
Before adoption, I suggest to fix the abbreviation of BIER-TE and clarify the
"TE" to Tree Engineering.
And I also noticed that the Figure 2, 3 and 4 has no figure name. It may be
better if this can be fixed in next version.
Best Regards,
Quan
<Hi WG,
< This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-chen-pce-bier-11.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/
<Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
< Please state your reasons -
<Why / Why not?
<What needs to be fixed before or after adoption?
<Are you willing to work on this draft?
<Review comments should be posted to the list.
< Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023.
< Please be more vocal during WG polls!
<Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
