Hi WG, I support adoption of this draft (co-author).
It provides useful extensions to PCEP for Circuit style policies, but those changes are potentially re-usable for other use cases, There is draft in spring, which is defining CS policy and it was adopted already: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy/ and changes in PCEP draft are needed to fully support it. To comment “What needs to be fixed before or after adoption?” – just to keep WG informed – we (co-authors) plan to add capability advertisement after adoption. Thanks a lot, Samuel From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 11:33 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: WG Adoption of draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
