Hi PCE WG, Support adoption as coauthor. The extensions provided in the document provide needed (interoperable) knobs to complete some use cases defined in the SPRING Circuit Style document. While the current goal is CS-SR, the encodings defined provide independent functionality that can be applicable to other use cases or used individually, including other path setup types thus is another useful tool in the toolbox.
Thanks Andrew From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> Date: Friday, December 1, 2023 at 5:33 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org> Cc: "draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensi...@ietf.org" <draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensi...@ietf.org> Subject: WG Adoption of draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org> Resent-To: <pengshup...@huawei.com>, <luay.ja...@verizon.com>, <ssi...@cisco.com>, <praveen.maheshw...@airtel.com>, <andrew.st...@nokia.com> Resent-Date: Friday, December 1, 2023 at 5:33 AM CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ http://draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
