Hi PCE-chairs, I submitted version 00 (which is aligned with draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05) – it is waiting for chairs approval.
I’ll upload 01 version with handled comments (from version 06) after approving submission of 00 version. (Sorry for delay – I’m on PTO, so my responses may be delayed). Thanks a lot, Samuel From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 12:58 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: WG Adoption of draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05 Hi WG, The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to those who provided feedback and comments. Authors, Please post a -00 version with no content change. Please handle comments received in -01. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:02 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
