Being vocal but late:-( p.3 "VENDOR- INFORMATION-TLV" seems to have acquired a spurious space which may mean that simple-minded text searches fail to find it
s.3 ' Information object will act according to the procedures set out in' 'will act' or 'MUST act'? s.4.1 I note too a possible mismatch of singular and plural s.4.2 'The standard YANG module MAY be extended to include the use of this information and the Enterprise Numbers that the object and the TLVs contain.' object (singular) - I am uncertain what this is referencing. The second clause reads a litle oddly to me. Tom Petch ________________________________________ From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Sent: 04 July 2024 14:17 To: [email protected] Cc: pce-chairs; [email protected] Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-03 Hi WG, This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-03. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-03.html Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on Thursday 18 July 2024. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
