Hi Murray, On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 9:46 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The IANA clarification you now have in Section 2 (and I agree with Orie's > prior > suggestion to move it there) makes me think you might want to indicate this > document updates the other two so that there's a forward reference to this > clarification. Without that, it may never be found. > > > Dhruv: Yes, based on the Paul's comment - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/YoPh1Nui69olefAO5e10Kmv5fmY/ We seem to have an agreement to change the "clarification" to an "update" - [RFC7470] stated that: "Enterprise Numbers are assigned by IANA and managed through an IANA registry [RFC2578]". This document updates [RFC7470] and replaces this text with: "Enterprise Numbers are assigned by IANA and managed through the "Private Enterprise Numbers (PENs)" registry as described in [RFC9371]." Let us know if you wish to see further change. Thanks! Dhruv (as document shepherd)
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
