Dear Adrian, I apologize for the lack of clarity in my previous comment. I think Lucy has a point. But I do not think the draft needs to me modified. My comment on the applicability of the PCE architecture in the Internet at large comes from the following lines in the Description of Working Group. (http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pce-charter.html).
I was referring to: The PCE WG will work on application of this model within a single domain or within a small group of domains (where a domain is a layer, IGP area or Autonomous System with limited visibility from the head-end LSR). At this time, applying this model to large groups of domains such as the Internet is not thought to be possible, and the PCE WG will not spend energy on that topic. This said, I think if our ultimate goal is to do inter-AS TE and path optimization in a PCE-based architecture, we must consider TED updating issues and PCE signaling responsiveness while we are still at the definition stage of the architecture and signaling protocols. Best regards, Meral Shirazipour _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
