| Hi Meral, On May 24, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:
Both items are indeed important. TED update: do you see any reason to change the way the TED is updated by the IGP in a PCE context ? Note that so called "distributed CSPF approach" is a specific instantiation of the PCE (LSR and PCE co-resident). PCEP communication responsiveness: this is an key metric indeed that is been considered during the protocol design (in line with the requirement IDs). Note also that there's a WG item related to "Objective metrics" for which several expressed some interest. We can expect some work to be done in this area and you're obviously very welcome to contribute. - Definition of objective metrics to evaluate various criteria such as the measurement of path quality, response time, robustness and scalability of path computation models. Thanks. JP.
|
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
