Hi, I would support this draft based on its content, but I only see one problem: it does not consider or even refer to draft-ietf-pce-brpc-04.txt (or maybe I missed it?). I would rather see a single draft covering all possible optimization scenarios/solutions based on the PCE architecture. Having several IDs for optimization applications is ok as long as they refer to each other and maybe provide an <inter-working> section between the different methods.
Cordially, Meral Selon JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear WG, > > Do you support the adoption of draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent- > optimization-04.txt as a Working Group document ? > > Thanks. > > JP. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
